wholesale apparel to the public
   

 A publication of Clothing 4 All.com

Cost Containment-8

  Buying Photo Copiers and Other Capital Assets

  Two-sided copying will NOT save money if you print less than 3,000 double sided pages each month.
 

Chapter 1

Cost Containment Defined

Chapter 2

Purchases of Standard Items

Chapter 3

Postage & Overnight Delivery

Chapter 4

Vehicle Maintenance

Chapter 5

Telecommunications

Chapter 6

Printing

Chapter 7

Cost Justification Strategy

Chapter 8

Buying Photo Copiers & Capital Equipment

Chapter 9

Time & Materials vs. Service Contract

Chapter 10

Advance Payment for Short Run Services

Chapter 11

Penalty Clauses for Non Performance

Chapter 12

Janitorial & Landscape Services

Chapter 13

Paper Records Storage

Chapter 14

Freight

Chapter 15

Lighting & Pollution


 

All rights reserved, including

 the right of reproduction in

whole or in part in any form.

Copyright ® 2003 by

Gene Constant, CPA, MBA

 When buying any capital asset, it is important that you separate emotion from the procurement equation. With all of the bells and whistles on today's office equipment, sellers cloud the buying issue by offering you features you do not need.

It is the seller's job to sell up and sell often. This is directly opposite of your desire to buy only what is needed and to run the equipment into the ground.


A field of dreams, show it and they will buy........

Before you start looking at equipment, you should create a "Needs and Wishes" list. On this list, you will ask yourself what needs you must have, such as:

a. maximum size of original documents determines glass surface area

b. maximum size of duplicated documents determines type of paper feeder or need for reduction and/or enlargement

c. type of documents some copiers offer features to easily copy books

d. how often multiple page documents are copied determines if you need a document handler
determines if you need a document sorter

e. number of copies you make each day/month

While purchasing over 100 copiers for a previous employer, I quickly learned during a survey of "Users' Perceived Needs" that they felt any copier, other than the most expensive, was inadequate. It seemed the quality and speed of the top-of-the-line model would be just barely suitable for them, and that management was too tight with a buck to provide adequate tools with which to work.

It's obvious that users will demand the best, as they are less concerned about price, since they don't have to pay for it directly. Indirectly, of course, they pay for it by being squeezed, in the entire budget/available-funds equation. Then, when bonus and salary issues surface, the money that was poured into unnecessary capital equipment has eaten away at funds that could have been given to staff. Many users fail to realize they are taking money from their pockets and giving it to a vendor.

As a budget manager, it is your duty to find the correct balance. For, on the other side of this thorny issue, productivity can only be achieved by ensuring adequate tools for individual performance.

A good method of determining needs is to conduct an unbiased survey, by borrowing a user friendly model from a probable vendor that carries every bell & whistle you want. Make sure the unit has various meters built into it, meters that measure the number of copies, number of copies per original, how often the stapler was used, etc. The Xerox 1090 copier has those meters, which I used to determine demand on an unbiased basis. If the unit you borrow does not have meters, you must provide a person to monitor the use of the copier.

Never rent this survey unit, borrow it. Many, if not most copier suppliers loan copiers on a thirty-day basis, to potential customers. Your only cost should be for toner & paper.

The second part of the survey is to provide a log for users to sign in before, and to sign out after use. Regardless of when they actually use the machine, they should be instructed to sign in immediately upon arrival. This effort will enable you to determine if the machine is too slow or whether you have enough copiers to meet demand. It will also allow you to determine when, and within what departments, peak demand occurs. Above all, you need to capture staff waiting time. The results of this list may also tell you that (i) you need more than one machine, (ii) you may wish to establish a copy center, allowing departments to leave copy jobs with a clerk for completion or (iii) that departments need to be scheduled to optimize existing capacity. For example, departments may be scheduled in a manner similar to that of metropolitan traffic, giving departments time segments within the day to operate the copier.

COPIER LOG

NAME          DEPARTMENT         TIME IN     TIME OUT     #OF COPIES
Jane                    Acct                  10:05        10:07              10
Ed                        Ops                   10:05        10:09              20
Sam                     Exec Off           10:20         10:21               3

Results: Three users total, one person waited two minutes during a sixteen minute machine activity, machine was idle eleven minutes.

These numbers will allow you to attach a value of both labor and machine. Hypothetically, you would assign a value of $8 per hour for employee time, versus the copier's hourly lease and maintenance cost of idle time.

Example: 02/60 minutes X $8 = 27 cents lost productivity versus

11/60 minutes X (($150 monthly rate + $35 maintenance cost) / 173 work hours in the month)) = 20 cents

In this measure, you lost 7 cents worth of productivity, over the idle cost of the asset. If your survey continues to reflect this sampling, you could afford to purchase a better machine or another machine, as long as the additional cost did not exceed the equilibrium difference of 7 cents.

Now then, if a self-monitoring copier is not available, have a person conduct a User Utility Survey on a random basis, utilizing the same criteria.

USER UTILITY LOG

#of originals       #of copies per             staple? (Y,N)              2 sided (Y,N)
5                               1                                    n                                 n
1                             20                                    y                                 n


Contrary to current belief, photocopying on both sides of a document does NOT cut your copy costs in half. The savings, utilizing a Canon 3050 is determined by dividing the cost of a sheet of paper ($0.005) by the total cost of printing a photocopy ($0.026), which results in a savings of only 5.2%, excluding the cost of the duplicating accessory.

You still have toner cost, copier cost (with maintenance usually paid on a per-copy basis) and the cost of the duplex accessory. You will save on paper, which costs about a half cent per page, and you will reduce the number of pages headed for a landfill. However, all of the dollar savings will be taken back by the copier vendor in aforementioned costs.

For example, a Canon 3050 copier, which does have the duplex feature, costs $800 more than the Canon 3030, which has all other features. Assuming you keep your copier for 60 months, it will cost you $13.33 per month to own the duplex feature. Remember, the cost to buy toner, maintenance and machine depreciation will not be altered AT ALL, regardless of your decision to print single-sided or double.

The equilibrium decision level, where it makes dollars and cents to buy a duplexer (excluding weight reduction for postage cost consideration), is 2,667 double-sided copies. Therefore, on the basis of cutting costs by copying both sides of a paper, you will need to print almost 3,000 double-sided documents per month before you consider this feature. You will have to exclude copies per month that are printed only on one side, to get a true picture. When all of the dust clears, it will cost you more to copy both sides of a piece of paper than to copy a sheet on one side. Now that you have finished a Needs Analysis, let's talk price. You must concern yourself with the entire cost of operating this product during its entire life, which is usually 60+ months. Some vendors will offer you a guarantee, like Canon's Five Year guarantee, while others will try to keep you locked into a thirty-six month cycle of buying or leasing a new machine.

During the sixty month operating life, insist upon a firm cost to maintain the unit. This will prevent you from falling into some marketing trick. For example, in 1989, Xerox offered a twenty-four month, free maintenance guarantee. To a novice, it seemed like gold from heaven. After all, FREE!

When I asked how much the maintenance would cost me AFTER the twenty-four month period, the salesperson was unprepared to respond. After several requests, I was finally given the secret numbers. Coming as no surprise to most of you, I learned that the maintenance expense on the twenty-fifth and future months was so high as to completely reimburse Xerox for the previous twenty-four months. Of six vendors participating in the bidding process, Xerox became the second highest in cost for service.

Also, be certain an adequate limit for "cost of living allowances (COLA)", etc. exists. In these service agreements, a vendor may attempt to recover any discounts given during the bidding process, by obtaining built-in, increase commitments during the future of the contract. Read the fine print and limit the vendor to the following:
1. Demand a guaranteed machine performance of at least sixty months.
2. In writing, get a "fix or replace performance guarantee," if the last copy copied is not as good as the first ever copied. It should work as good as a new one.
3. Insist upon a written letter or price list, giving the maintenance cost during the entire sixty months.
4. Compare "time & materials costs" to that of a "full-service contract."
5. Be sure any service plan commences AFTER the warranty has expired.
6. Include a non-performance penalty clause.

There is a lesson to be learned from Shell Oil's efforts to sell kerosene to the inhabitants of mainland China during the early 1900s. Shell Oil created demand for their petroleum product by giving away kerosene lamps. To illustrate how history repeats itself, 3M created a demand for Post-It Notes by giving them away to unsuspecting office staff; and Apple gave a free computer to every school in America who asked for one.

Copier vendors have almost perfected the practices that were pioneered by 3M and Shell. I am convinced that the profit on service and supplies is so substantial for copier vendors, as to allow them to give-away the copier. As you negotiate the purchase price of the actual machine, you should keep that in mind. Think of the Shell Oil lamps. Vendors should and can give steep (up to 30%), discounts from published retails.

A common practice of copier vendors is to establish a selling price. Typically, a salesperson is given that price as a ceiling and a lower net, about 30% to 40%, as a floor. Any money on the table above that floor is split between vendor and his salesperson. For multi-unit orders, salespeople can expect a percent of the entire sale, providing they do not go below the floor. At the floor, a copier vendor in California still collected a 30% profit over actual net cost. Do not allow a vendor to insult you by telling you that the margin is thin, it is just untrue.

When buying a copier, examine EVERY detail to determine the lifetime cost to operate this machine.

Examine:

1. Maintenance for sixty months, T&M or Full Contract
2. Toner cost & yield
3. Guarantees
4. Acceptable monthly copy rate
5. Electrical consumption (yes, electricity is an expense)
6. Lease or purchase
and, if your copier is thirty-six or sixty months old, and the vendor is pushing a new machine, before you prepare to buy a new machine.
7. If your copier is working well and existing maintenance and supply cost is less than replacement-maintenance-supply costs of a new unit, do not buy the new unit.

Lastly, when comparing products from multiple vendors, NEVER share confidential quotes from other vendors. DO share specifications, asking if the story is accurate and/or complete.
Opinion: I found Canon copiers and micrographics products to offer the best value, of the seven vendors considered for the 100+ unit purchase I made in 1989.
 

                       
2005 © Copyright  All rights reserved.