wholesale apparel to the public
   

 A publication of Clothing 4 All.com

Cost Containment-14

  Freight

  Consolidate Carriers to Obtain Volume Discount, Maximize Upon Your Buying Power
 

Chapter 1

Cost Containment Defined

Chapter 2

Purchases of Standard Items

Chapter 3

Postage & Overnight Delivery

Chapter 4

Vehicle Maintenance

Chapter 5

Telecommunications

Chapter 6

Printing

Chapter 7

Cost Justification Strategy

Chapter 8

Buying Photo Copiers & Capital Equipment

Chapter 9

Time & Materials vs. Service Contract

Chapter 10

Advance Payment for Short Run Services

Chapter 11

Penalty Clauses for Non Performance

Chapter 12

Janitorial & Landscape Services

Chapter 13

Paper Records Storage

Chapter 14

Freight

Chapter 15

Lighting & Pollution

 


 

All rights reserved, including

 the right of reproduction in

whole or in part in any form.

Copyright ® 2003 by

Gene Constant, CPA, MBA

 
 This is the most expensive and least understood of all the vendor-supplied services. For some, it represents an opportunity to generate income. For everyone, a look at freight costs should result in a reduction of expenses.

Many managers have strong memories of buying, and attempting to deal with, a regulated industry. In the old days, before Congress passed the 1980 Motor Carrier Act, this industry was difficult to understand and more difficult to communicate with. While this topic is most beneficial for firms who have a shipping department, there are bits and pieces in this segment for almost everyone.

With the advent of deregulation, smart freight carriers have become innovative and responsive. This can equal faster delivery to either you or your customer, at an equal or lower rate than you are paying now. It can also result in improved, information services.

During a freight study for an employer, I recently evaluated twelve truck companies and United Parcel Service. The firm's outbound freight expense was approximately $130,000 per year. The average freight cost per dollar of sales was 8%. This figure did not include our own delivery vehicles, which had an equal expense ratio to sales. Our outbound freight volume had been divided between six carriers. Assuming all carriers are giving us the same discount, service, etc., our one-door, receiving/shipping department is easily congested when more than two trucks and/or trailers are present. My goal was to reduce the number of carriers serving us. The reasons for this desired outcome are that (i) the transaction cost of Accounts Payable, Customer Service and Traffic Coordinator is substantially reduced (soft dollars), (ii) we would obtain a greater discount, in exchange for offering greater volume and efficiency to the carrier (greater load per pick-up), and we would obtain the use of a vendor-supplied, management information link-up (E.D.I.).

To make an informed decision, you need to know something about why you are using a service. In supplying information to the vendors, as a means of determining how much of the aforementioned value my firm could obtain, I was able to tell them only that:


1. My dollar volume was distributed between northern California, Oregon and Washington.
2. 55% of my outbound freight weighs more than 160 pounds.
3. Some shipments were trailer load, most were LTL (less than trailer load).
4. All UPS shipments were going in individual 20 pound, 14 x 12 x 12 boxes (health & beauty aid product is sent in "fragile" packaging).


INBOUND FREIGHT
During the negotiation process, the picture improved a lot. I learned that my inbound freight, which is almost exclusively shipped prepaid by the supplier, could evolve into a profit center. As my inbound freight is approximately the cost of outbound, it did not take a rocket scientist to determine that any percentage of our annual $250,000 freight expense is a good piece of change. The way to slice the inbound pie is to negotiate with your suppliers to give you a freight allowance equal to their cost of freight to you. You are NOT asking for them to incur a greater expense, just to pass along their identical cost to you in the form of an allowance.

With your freight company, in the course of negotiations, you obtain a commitment for an "unloading allowance." This allowance is available, but not volunteered, because their drivers do not unload the truck, you do. Many will give you a 2% to 7% unloading allowance, for each order you send them. This allowance is earned if the freight is paid for by the supplier, AND if you designate the carrier as your carrier of choice. By giving the carrier the business, they will give you cash value.

Once you have determined your cost of freight, following an extensive freight rating evaluation (as illustrated below), you next step is to determine if your volume discount will result in a lesser freight cost than the discount given off the invoice. When your supplier pays the freight expense, you will usually receive an invoice that indicates the cost of shipping that particular order. You need merely to balance your negotiated rate with that of the invoice. Adding the income generated from the off-loading allowance, to the variance of your "freight terms from pre-paid to collect" equation, you then make a case-by-case decision as to the method your freight is delivered.

Either way, you must still insist upon your company designating a carrier, as income and control are gained.

RESULT: This distribution firm gained $10,000 per year by understanding and changing the terms of freight. It also reduced the time spent by employees to trace orders, as they had computer access to the freight carrier's mainframe which gave them current data as to PRO number, where the freight was (within eight hours), and monthly reports. The reports will be used to give potential suppliers a clearer picture of the business, which will result in either greater savings or a lesser increase the next time you go out to bid.

As I mentioned earlier, what gets measured gets done. To determine if any savings or profits can be realized on your shipping costs, or if service can be improved, you must perform two vital tasks. Yes, you could do exactly as I did, or you could obtain the maximum benefit from the business you give a carrier. If you have the staff to perform a file search and data accumulation, I recommend you complete step one before proceeding to the second step.

Step #1. Utilizing a database program, compile the following results:


                                                 Destination Report

                                     Reporting Period: 02/01/03 to 09/01/03

Shipped To (there is also a Point of Origin Report)
                                                                          Number    Invoice                        Date         Date
State    City               Carrier                 Weight  of Boxes Amount Class % Disc Shipped    Received
CA       Alhambra      Federal Express  120.00       6         $95.90             0.00    08/01/03   08/15/03
            Long Beach  Yellow Freight     250.00       1         $300.00  55   35.00    07/15/03   07/23/03
            San Diego     Consolidated        951.00    40          $850.21  57   55.00    06/29/03    07/01/03

S T A T E   T O T A L S                         1321.00     47       $1,246.11


                                                Carrier Evaluation Report


                                      Reporting Period: 02/01/03 to 09/01/03


                                Invoice       Weight   Number    Average           % of PPD         % of Collect
Carrier                       Totals       Totals   of Boxes     % Disc              Invoices             Invoices
Federal Express      $2,546.01   3,200       94           00.00%              100.00%            00.00%
Yellow Freight         $3,100.00   4,000       99           40.00%                90.00%            10.00%

R E P O R T   T O T A L S :           $5,646.01         7,200           193

Step #2. Complete a Freight Vendor Analysis, utilizing the following Carrier Rating System, asking for complete disclosure, with service and discounts based upon the volume and destination information shown within step #1.

CARRIER RATING SYSTEM

The carrier rating is based upon a total scale that has a maximum point value of one, and is made up of five major segments.
1. Carrier Responsiveness = .15 points maximum
(allow .03 points for each reply)
Does this carrier provide:
Courteous, knowledgeable and professional personnel___
Periodic calls in person or by telephone____
On-time pickups____
Electronic Data Interchange capability____
Service Reports on a regular basis____

2. Financial Condition = .15 points maximum
(Give four points for each profitable year, and three extra points if all three years were profitable)
Within the last three years, determine, from his financial statement, whether the carrier has earned a profit from operations. After all, you don't want to risk losing any goods in transit, as that act may cost you the firm's profits for the year. Ask for their operating ratio. It should equal or exceed 96%.

3. Claims = .20 points maximum
(Subdivided into three areas, give each segment 5 points maximum and add the last .05 points if exceptional claims resolution are proven.)

3a. Loss & Damage Claims Ratio and Incidence should be less than 0.80 percent. To determine the ratio, divide the number of claims filed by the number of shipments. If the LDC ratio exceeds 2%, you will be hard pressed to justify further evaluation of this carrier.

3b. Loss & Damage Claims Services are based on how carriers react to help resolve claims upon notification. Most carriers have a standard, and maintain measures of actual performance against that standard. Example: 90% of all claims will be resolved in thirty days.

3c. Overcharge claims are based on the ratio of dollar amount of adjustments to revenue. This area is difficult to obtain information on from vendors. Insist upon it as it is available, because they must report such matters on a routine basis to the Interstate Commerce Commission.

4. Pricing = .30 points
A maximum of .17 points for actual discount rate; .04 points for innovative price proposals; and .09 points for pointing out innovative ways to reduce shipping costs in areas such as packaging or use of freight auditors.

Remember the golden rule - the one with the gold rules. As long as you have not indicated a preference in carriers or in terms, you are still in control. The perception by the carrier of your interest, or lack thereof, can effect your cost. As long as you have a tight hand on the checkbook, you will rule the negotiating process. When negotiating price, do not let the carrier know what discount you are getting now, the discount you want, or what other bidders are offering. If you tell him anything about price expectations, you will never discover what your true market cost is. Lastly, do not barter back & forth between vendors, as word of that act will get around, eroding your future negotiating efforts.

Beware of choosing perception over performance. Do not let polished sales talk or slick brochures turn your eyes from the actual value the carrier will give you. Stick with the results of this analysis, as it is reasonably unbiased, and allows you to segregate most freight variables and assign a factor to each of the five sections. While some managers see only the price factor, this analysis considers (i) the financial strength of the shipper (as you do not wish to have your freight become the property of a creditor), (ii) carrier responsiveness (service after the contract), (iii) resolution of claims for loss, damage or overcharges, (iv) speed and completeness of service, and (v) price.

Price is not only what you pay, but what you recover on past overcharges and what you avoid paying in the future. The recent rash of bankruptcies have resulted in claims to shippers from either trustees or creditors of bankrupt, motor freight (truck) carriers. Your failure to file your earned discount with the Interstate Commerce Commission (I.C.C.) could result in your firm being sued, to recover that discount.
The trustee for bankrupt Overland Express sent a bill to General Mills in the mid-1990s for over $450,000, claiming the required Customer Pricing Notification Tariff paperwork for the I.C.C. was not filed by either Overland Express or General Mills. This issue is not defendable when there is no proof of I.C.C. filing, as the United States Supreme Court has found back-billing to be permissible. Back-billing is defined as the process of invoicing the difference between the amount previously invoiced and paid, and the undiscounted amount. While this act of back-billing appears to be a disavowal of a contract, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters supports this process as a means to recover under-funded pensions, health claims and wages, to former employees. You may all be shocked and surprised (NOT!) to learn that some unethical persons are believed to be actually altering the filed tariff documents.
Therefore, whatever the discount, be certain after you or your carrier files it with the I.C.C., that you have a copy of this filing in a safe, next to a certificate of insurance from the carrier's insurance company. Be certain to stipulate to your carrier that you will not commence services without a copy of the filing in your hands.

5. Service = .20 points
(Give a maximum of .10 points, based upon the carrier's service statistics of their on-time service, .05 points for a guarantee of on-time pick up or delivery with a performance penalty clause, and .05 points for both our warehouse manager's and the carrier's references remarks, regarding the carrier's ability to (a) handle expedited shipments, (b) ability to trace shipments, (c) reliability of pickup, (c) communications with warehouse manager, (d) willingness to help with problems and, (e) cleanliness of equipment.)

As a result of my evaluation of twelve, motor freight carriers, I found:
a. Discounts from my freight class range from 36% to 55%.
b. Service varied by almost 100% ( L.A. to Oregon and Washington with one carrier was four days, while most were two days).
c. Some Electronic Data Interchange resources for shippers were not user-friendly.
e. Claims resolution ranged from 70% to 95%, within thirty days.
For my firm, it was important to consolidate vendors to one or two, obtain vendor supplied information as to freight in transit to us or to our customer, and to reduce costs while generating revenue.
RESULT OF MY EVALUATION: Consolidated Freightways earned the highest points earner overall, while Willig scored highest in price, claims resolution and service within California.
For small shipments, United Parcel Service has an interesting program known as HUNDREDWEIGHT SERVICE. Most of you are aware that UPS will send seventy pounds in a box for as little as $6.96. With motor freight carriers charging anywhere from $35 to $64 for a 100-pound shipment, thank goodness for UPS. Keeping that $35 minimum freight cost in mind, go a bit further into UPS by evaluating their Hundredweight program. With that service, you can ship 200 pounds or more, for as little as $8.60 per hundred pounds, or $17.60 for that 200-pound order.

Your final step in setting a freight policy is to compare the program of your carrier of choice to that of UPS. Find the equilibrium point from which it would not matter, from a dollar and cents perspective, which vendor was chosen.

With the big issues out of the way, let's look at a little one, namely the small shipments you are sending via UPS. As I discussed earlier, UPS is the businessperson's favorite, small parcel carrier. They love those seventy pounds or less packages. As Operations Manager for a firm who distributed health and beauty supplies, I devised a method of reducing damaged goods and freight costs. Historically, to minimize crushed or broken items, it was more economical, from a freight claims perspective, to limit the packaging to 14 x 12 x 12-inch boxes. A review of the UPS freight bills indicated that these boxes were consistently 20-pound boxes which cost a minimum of $3.68 to ship.

To reduce freight costs, I had an overpack box made, a box that would hold three of my 20-pound boxes. This overpack box cost me 80 cents. However, the UPS minimum rate for 60 pounds (20 x 3) is $6.73. Anyone could see that $3.68 x 3 = $11.04, while my total cost of the 60-pound alternative was $6.73 + .80 = $7.53. By constructing the overpack and changing shipping policy, I saved over 31%. Of course, for shipments with only two 20-pound boxes, I merely taped them together, reducing a ($3.68 x 2) $7.36 cost, to $5.64, for a 23% savings.

Speaking of boxes, it is important to go to the source, bypassing distributors, brokers and sheet plants. You will reduce your box cost by as much as 40% when you purchase from a box corrugator.
Let's not stop now, for I have the key to unlock cash from your paid invoices. Yes, I'm talking about freight overcharges. Many managers don't know that the I.C.C. will allow a shipper to recover overcharges made by the carrier during the previous thirty-six months. I heartily recommend that you contact Associated Traffic Services at 858 Oak Park Road, Suite 103, Covina, California 91724, phone (818) 967-0677, and have them audit your freight bills. They work on a percentage of found money. If they find an overcharge, they will make a claim for you; you will receive a check from the carrier and pay Associated half of that sum upon receipt. It costs you nothing for the audit, it's found money!

Some people will cringe at the idea of giving half of the money to an auditing firm. My reply is that half of nothing is still nothing. If you do not send it to them, you will have nothing. I am not one to plug a firm as I did this one. However, it is difficult to discover where these audit firms are and freight companies are not interested in finding a source from which to reduce their income.

This may be a perfect opportunity to clear up the misuse of an often used term known as "f.o.b.", "free on board." This phrase originated over a century ago, and meant that you, the shipper, would be responsible for your cargo until it was actually loaded upon a ship. It has NOTHING to do with the cost of freight. It has EVERYTHING to do with legal title. If you ask for "f.o.b. destination," you are stating, as the consignee, that the supplier is responsible for insurance, etc. until the goods are delivered to your receiving facility. Any claim resulting from theft or damage must be made by the shipper, who is responsible for the value of the goods.

If you ask for "f.o.b. point of origin," you are assuming legal title of the goods, at the shipper's loading dock, and are responsible for the value, at the moment the goods are loaded upon a truck or other conveyance.

The purpose of assigning the correct f.o.b. term is to take control or, inversely, state that the other party has responsibility for the value of the goods in question. The responsible party has the right to designate how the goods are to be delivered. To obtain the maximum value of your inbound freight, and to consolidate carriers to facilitate an E.D.I. arrangement, it is in your best interest to ask for F.O.B. POINT OF ORIGIN, and FREIGHT COLLECT, two separate terms. When you specify Freight Collect terms, you are stating that you, the consignee, will be responsible for the actual expense, not the shipper (supplier).

Be certain your allowances from the designated carrier exceed, or at least meet the allowances earned from the supplier. On some occasions, the supplier may have a better discount than you do. In that case, it may cost you more than you earn, which may be a big negative.

A carrier is a vendor who provides the service of carrying your goods from a point of origin to a specific destination. A shipper is one who possesses and/or sells goods to another.

In instances where you wish to have no liability, merely ask for F.O.B. DESTINATION. The issues of "freight pre-paid" or "freight collect" can be discussed, but the party with the liability has the final say in the matter.
 

                       
2005 © Copyright  All rights reserved.